ANTONIO VENZAL, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-08-25

No. 3D04-1944

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH and SHEPHERD, JJ.

882 So. 2d 1057 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004) Positive Treatment

Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lopez v. State, 861 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Jackson v. State, 987 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)

…teen years, instead of the thirty years he actually faced. He alleges that he would have accepted the state’s plea offer of five years but for counsel’s misadvice. Instead, after conviction, he was sentenced to thirty years. See also Ortiz v. State, 882 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (legally sufficient claim where defendant alleged that had he known he could be sentenced as a PRR, he would have accepted the more favorable plea offer); Wright v. State, 892 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (legally sufficient c…
Simmons v. State, 48 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)

…g enhanced sentencing laws for which the State had given defense counsel notice. However, the transcript of the plea hearing is silent regarding PRR sanctions, and the written plea forms do not specifically mention PRR sanctions. In Ortiz v. State, 882 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), the defendant sought rule [*136] 3.850 relief, claiming that his defense counsel failed to advise him that he could be sentenced as a PRR upon conviction and, therefore, he refused to accept a more favorable plea offer. Although…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw