FRONTIER INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS GROUP, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS FRONTIER INTERNATIONAL MARKETING GROUP, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI FREE ZONE CORPORATION A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND GERMAN LEIVA, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2004-08-18
Nos. 3D03-2435, 3D03-2079
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and GODERICH, JJ.
883 So. 2d 300 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Star Fruit Co. v. Eagle Lake Growers, 160 Fla. 130, 33 So. 2d 858 (1948).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Gaskins, 891 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)
    …to section 322.271(4), violates the single subject rule. The Critchfield decision “resulted in reinstatement of the 1997 version of the statute until the constitutional defect was cured.” State, Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Fountain, 883 So. 2d 300, 301 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). The legislature cured the defect when it “reenacted the 1999 version of the Florida Statutes, effective July 1, 2003.” Id. at 301 n. 1. Thus, as of July 1, 2003, section 322.271(4) specifically provided as follows: (4) No…
  • Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Johnson, 980 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)
    …ned in chapter 98-223 was cured by the enactment of chapter 03-25. See Lescher, 946 So. 2d at 1141-42; Rothauser, 934 So. 2d at 19-20; Gorman v. State, 927 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); State, Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Fountain, 883 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Gillman v. State, 860 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). Accordingly, the amended version of section 322.271(4) became effective on July 1, 2003, and Johnson had a window period, which closed on that date, to obtain reinstatement…
  • State v. Aiden, 118 So. 3d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …minating hardship licenses for drivers permanently revoked did not impose criminal punishment, was related to regulatory purpose, and loss of driving privilege was not an affirmative disability); Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Fountain, 883 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding that it is within the Department’s discretion to decide whether to reinstate the license of a petitioner who meets statutorily specified requirements). Affirmed. . Any person whose driver's license has been revoked pur…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw