DOUG HAMBEL'S PLUMBING, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MILES V. CONWAY, VERO VENTURES, ETC., ET AL, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Doug Hambel's Plumbing appeals from an order denying its motion for attorney's fees in a mechanic's lien action. The court holds that the motion was timely because it was filed within thirty days of the judgment on remand that imposed the mechanic's lien, not the original judgment that denied the lien.
The motion for attorney's fees was timely. The thirty-day period for filing the motion under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525 is triggered by the judgment that imposed the mechanic's lien on remand, not the original judgment that denied the lien, because the entitlement to fees under section 713.29 only ripened when the lien was ultimately imposed.
[1] A motion for attorney's fees under section 713.29, Florida Statutes, is timely when filed within thirty days of a judgment imposing a mechanic's lien, even if an earlier…
[2] The thirty-day period for filing a motion for attorney's fees under Rule 1.525, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, is triggered by the judgment that establishes entitlemen…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Any party seeking a judgment taxing costs, attorneys' fees, or both shall serve a motion within 30 days after filing of the judgment, including a judgment of dismissal, or the service of a notice of voluntary dismissal.”
Statement of the applicable rule governing timeliness of attorney's fee motions under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn August 24, 2001, the trial court entered judgment for Doug Hambel's Plumbing awarding damages but denying its mechanic's lien request. Hambel's app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Timeliness Of Motion For Attorney'S Fees cases and more on FLexlaw
MAY, J.
The plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for attorney’s fees in a mechanic’s lien action. The issue is whether the motion was timely when filed within thirty days of the judgment entered upon a reversal and remand from this court. We hold that it was, and therefore reverse the order denying attorney’s fees.
On August 24, 2001, the trial court entered a judgment for the plaintiff, Doug Hambel’s Plumbing, Inc., which awarded damages, but denied its request for a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff appealed the denial of the mechanic’s lien. This court reversed and remanded the case to the trial court. See Doug Hambel’s Plumbing, Inc. v. Conway, 831 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 4th DCA2002).
The plaintiff then moved for entry of a final judgment consistent with this court’s decision. On June 13, 2003, the trial court entered a final judgment imposing a mechanic’s lien and retained jurisdiction for consideration of costs and attorney’s fees. On July 11, 2003, the plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees, pursuant to section 713.29, Florida Statutes (2003). On November 10, 2003, the trial court entered an order finding the plaintiff to be the prevailing party and entitled to attorney’s fees, but denied the motion because it was not filed within thirty days of the original August 24, 2001 final judgment.
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.525 provides: “[a]ny party seeking a judgment taxing costs, attorneys’ fees, or both shall serve a motion within 30 days after filing of the judgment, including a judgment of dismissal, or the service of a notice of voluntary dismissal.” The question is which judgment in this case triggered the 30-day requirement for filing the motion for attorneys’ fees.
The basis upon which the plaintiff sought fees was section 713.29, Florida Statutes (2003), which provides for attorney’s fees in actions seeking to impose a mechanic’s lien. When the August 24, 2001 judgment was entered, the plaintiffs request for a mechanic’s lien had been denied. Therefore, the court could not award fees under section 713.29 at that time.
It was not until this court reversed the denial of the lien in Doug Hambel’s Plumbing and the trial court entered a judgment on the lien that the entitlement to fees under this statute ripened. The plaintiff filed its motion within thirty days of the judgment in which the lien was imposed. Thus, its motion was timely.
We hold the trial court erred when it used the date of the original judgment to determine the timeliness of the motion. We reverse the order and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
POLEN, J„ and GOLD, MARC H., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alpaugh Plumbing & Supply OF Tampa, Inc. v. THE Fee-Walters Corp., 947 So. 2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)…ract); Mershon v. Buckles-Thompson, Inc., 383 So. 2d 280, 280 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (“There is sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment on the oral contract but not for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien.”). In Doug Hambel’s Plumbing, Inc. v. Conway, 883 So. 2d 375, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), the trial court originally entered a judgment for and awarded damages to the plaintiff but denied plaintiffs request for a mechanic’s lien. The Fifth District reversed the denial of the mechanic’s lien, and the trial court…
Authorities Cited
- Doug Hambel's Plumbing, Inc. v. Miles V. Conway, 831 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)