ROSA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Thompson v. State, 990 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 2008)
  …2007). The district court certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the decisions of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Goines v. State, 708 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and Second District Court of Appeal in Kleppinger v. State, 884 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Thompson II, 949 So. 2d at 1179. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The question before this Court concerns the appropriate standard for determining prejudice with regard to an ineffective assistance of coun…
• Thompson v. State, 949 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
  …equirement that he show prejudice. (B) Strickland, is Still the Standard for IAC Claims Finally, we disagree with decisions issued by both the Second and Fourth Districts. The factual circumstances and legal issues involved in Kleppinger v. State, 884 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) and Goines v. State, 708 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), are quite similar to those of the instant case. However, here, we find ourselves unable to accept the legal conclusions reached in those cases. In Kleppinger, the Second Di…
• Revell v. State, 989 So. 2d 751 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)
  …er without benefit of knowing his potential HFO exposure. Counsel’s failure to accurately advise his client of the maximum sentence he faced when considering the offer of a plea negotiation amounts to ineffective assistance. See Kleppinger v. State, 884 So. 2d 146, 148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (concluded that allegation that counsel “fail[ed] to advise [defendant] of possible sentences he faced if he proceeded to trial” and that “he would have accepted the State’s plea offer if he had been properly advised ... stat…