ROMUN JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2004-10-05
No. 5D03-3685
SHARP, W., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
884 So. 2d 446 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cole v. State, 701 So. 2d 845 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1051, 118 S.Ct. 1370, 140 L.Ed.2d 519 (1998); Merck v. State, 664 So. 2d 939 (Fla.1995).

SHARP, W., PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Chase Fin. Servs., LLC. v. Edelsberg, 129 So. 3d 1139 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
    …any subordinate interest may cure the mortgagor’s indebtedness and prevent a foreclosure sale by paying the amount of moneys specified in the judgment, order, or decree of foreclosure”); see also YEMC Constr. & Dev., Inc. v. Inter Ser, U.S.A., Inc., 884 So. 2d 446, 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (confirming that a “trial court [was] without authority to extend the period of redemption” after the filing of a certificate of sale where the final judgment cut off the right of redemption upon filing of the certificate of…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw