DALE R. PHELPS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
DALE R. PHELPS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
885 So. 2d 393
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
WOLF, C.J., BARFIELD and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bio-Med Plus, Inc. v. State, 915 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…4th DCA 1994) (citing Commercial Consultants Corp. v. Dep’t of Bus. Regulation, 363 So. 2d 1162, 1164 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)). It is not enough for the ESO merely to allege statutory violations. Robin Hood Group, Inc. v. Fla. Office of Ins. Regulation, 885 So. 2d 393, 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). As we explained in Field: Under section 120.60(6)(b) in an emergency action to suspend a license an agency may take only that action necessary to protect the public interest. In addition, an emergency order issued pri- or…
-
Rehab. Ctr. AT Hollywood Hills, LLC v. State, 250 So. 3d 737 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)…added). "The standard of review of an immediate final order is whether, on its face, the order 'sufficiently states particularized facts showing an immediate danger to the public welfare.' " Robin Hood Grp., Inc. v. Fla. Office of Ins. Regulation , 885 So. 2d 393, 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (quoting Saviak v. Gunter , 375 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979) ). Immediate final orders "must contain facts sufficient to demonstrate: (1) Immediate, serious danger to the public health, safety, or welfare; (2) The order t…
-
Valls v. Dept. of Health, 255 So. 3d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence