GREGORY J. LEBRON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Gregory LeBron appealed the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief on twenty-one grounds. The trial court denied the motion as untimely, but the appellate court remanded because the mailbox rule may have rendered the motion timely, and at least one ground—alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to strike a biased juror—appeared facially sufficient.
The court held that unless the trial court found the motion was not delivered to prison officials within the two-year period, application of the mailbox rule requires the motion to be entertained as timely filed. The court also held that the allegation regarding failure to strike the biased juror appeared facially sufficient and stronger than analogous claims recognized in prior cases.
[1] A motion for postconviction relief is deemed filed when delivered to prison officials for mailing, pursuant to the mailbox rule.
[2] A trial court must consider the timeliness of a postconviction motion under the mailbox rule before addressing its substantive grounds.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Application of the mailbox rule deems the motion to have been filed when delivered to prison officials for mailing and unless the trial court finds that the motion was not delivered to the prison officials within that two-year period, the motion should be entertained.”
Establishes the standard for applying the mailbox rule to timely-filed motions by incarcerated defendants.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLeBron was convicted and sentenced; his direct appeal was affirmed and the mandate issued on October 12, 2001. LeBron, an incarcerated defendant, cert…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Juror Bias cases and more on FLexlaw
PETERSON, J.
Gregory J. LeBron appeals the denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which raised twenty-one grounds for relief. The primary basis of the denial was that the motion was not filed within the two-year period prescribed by the rule.
LeBron’s direct appeal of his conviction and sentence became final when the mandate affirming them was issued by this court on October 12, 2001. LeBron, who is incarcerated, certified that he delivered his motion to prison officials on October 10, 2003, although the trial court found that it was untimely filed on October 20, 2003. Application of the mailbox rule deems the motion to have been filed when delivered to prison officials for mailing and unless the trial court finds that the motion was not delivered to the prison officials within that two-year period, the motion should be entertained.
Because we are unsure as to whether the trial court appropriately considered the twenty-one grounds for relief set forth in the motion in view of the finding of untimeliness, we remand for further proceedings. We specifically direct the trial court’s attention to ground number VIII which alleged that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to strike a juror who allegedly stated that LeBron “must be guilty of something, if the State accused him of a crime” and that “a defendant is presumed guilty, and should have to prove his innocence.”
In Walker v. State, 765 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), which involved analogous facts, this court determined that the defendant’s claim was facially sufficient when it alleged that trial counsel failed to challenge a juror who allegedly knew the state’s key witness. The alleged facts in the instant case appear to us stronger than those in Walker. See also Austing v. State, 804 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Thomas v. State, 700 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).
Accordingly, we vacate the order denying relief and remand for further review of LeBron’s motion to include the issue of timeliness of filing of the motion under the mailbox rule and to determine the sufficiency of the motion if found to be timely filed.
ORDER VACATED AND REMANDED.
SAWAYA, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Isiah Thomas v. State, 700 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- J.S. and N.S. v. Dep't of Child. & Families, 804 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- Austing v. State, 804 So. 2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
- Walker v. State, 765 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)