ABNER M. AUST, PETITIONER,

v.

STEVEN P. GLAZER, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Med. Logistics, Inc. v. Marchines, 911 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …unsel had participated, along with claimant’s counsel, in examining the witness before the hearing to discover the substance of the testimony. Nor is this a case where a rule was mechanistically applied. Compare Ryan’s Family Steakhouse v. Whitlock, 886 So. 2d 247, 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Cedar Hammock, So. 2d at 893. The court’s ruling today allows parties— without so much as a pretext of justification — to violate, with impunity, pretrial orders entered by judges of compensation claims. This ill serves th…
• Am. Airlines & Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs., Inc. v. Hennessey, 162 So. 3d 232 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …deposition, instead accepting it as a proffer. III. We turn first to the E/C’s challenge to the JCC’s exclusion of the nurse’s deposition. A JCC’s exclusion of evidence is reviewed for abuse of discretion. See Ryan's Family Steakhouse v. Whitlock, 886 So. 2d 247, 248 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (holding JCC’s exclusion of witness was abuse of discretion where no prejudice to objecting party was shown, “such as surprise or unfair disadvantage”). “In the absence of other compelling circumstances, late disclosure whic…

Authorities Cited

• Dumas v. Marrero, 864 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)