JACOMIAH WALKER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-10-25
No. 1D03-3809
BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.
886 So. 2d 1007 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals his conviction and sentence, alleging that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow a witness, who had been disclosed to the State, to testify at trial. The State concedes error. Donaldson v. State, 656 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Thus, Appellant’s conviction and sentence are reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 2005)
    …la. 1st DCA 2005); Santiago v. State, 893 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Washington v. State, 890 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); King v. State, 891 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Card v. State, 889 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Walker v. State, 886 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Long v. State, 886 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Stewart v. State, 884 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Wilson v. State, 884 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Ellis v. State, 881 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); B.L.J. v. State, 880…
  • Ranell Tillery, Jr. v. Fla. Dep't of Juv. Just., 104 So. 3d 1253 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
    …with the usual recognition of deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute it is charged to administer.” Big Bend Hospice, Inc. v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 904 So. 2d 610, 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (quoting Cone v. State Dep’t of Health, 886 So. 2d 1007, 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)). Nevertheless: a reviewing court can overturn the agency’s interpretation of a statute if the interpretation is clearly erroneous. Additionally, Section 120.68, Florida Statutes (2003), provides that a reviewing court may…
  • …SA 2B. We affirm as to all issues raised regarding both final orders and write only to articulate the standard of review in appeals from administrative proceedings involving certificates of need. As we explained in Cone v. State, Dep’t of Health, 886 So. 2d 1007, 1009 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), a review of an order of an administrative agency begins “with the usual recognition of deference to an agency’s interpretation of a statute it is charged to administer.” See also Ocampo v. Dep’t of Health, 806 So. 2d 633,…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw