CAROLYN MAYE, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hankins v. State, 42 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
  …ain based on his release from confinement in New York due to the same criminal possession of a weapon conviction. On direct appeal, this court struck the HFO designation but oth [*873] erwise affirmed the judgment and sentence. See Hankins v. State, 886 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). That sentence is not challenged in these proceedings. II. The New York Offenses The records in Mr. Hankins’ trial court file from New York are not extensive. They indicate that he has been in prison in New York on several occas…
• Jeramy Danial Rule v. State, 997 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …06-23329, 06-23331, and 06-23334, the court erroneously imposed such equal concurrent PRR and HFO or HVFO sentences. Accordingly, we reverse those sentences with directions for the court to strike the HFO or HVFO designations. See Hankins v. State, 886 So. 2d 1026, 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). We note that the trial court has already granted this relief in response to Rule’s motion to correct sentencing error; however, that relief is a nullity because it was not granted within sixty days. See Whitmore v. State, 9…
• Percival Ferris v. State, 46 So. 3d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …elow, we reverse. The appellant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment on count one as both a PRR and an HVFO. A trial court cannot impose equal concurrent PRR and HVFO sentences. See Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2000); Hankins v. State, 886 So. 2d 1026 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (“Under the holding in Grant, [the defendant] can receive both enhancements to his sentence so long as the habitual offender designation is longer than, not equal to or shorter than, the term required as a prison releasee reoffend…

Authorities Cited

• Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004)