DAVID W. BECKER, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID W. BECKER, SR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
887 So. 2d 355
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2002)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Banks v. State, 801 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), petition for rev. pending, case no. SC01-2733.
KAHN, WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simmons v. State, 887 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 2004)…PER CURIAM. We have for review the decision in State v. Simmons, 887 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decision in McCray v. State, 730 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we quash the Third District’s decision an…
-
State v. Simmons, 944 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)…court thus abused its discretion by dismissing the April 5 charges.2 [*1125] Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. COPE, C.J., concurs. . Simmons v. State, 887 So. 2d 1283 (Fla. 2004), rev’g 887 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). . "Rulings as to the necessity of providing the names and addresses of witnesses for the defendant to have a fair trial are rulings which must of necessity rest upon the broad discretion of the trial court.” State v. Jones, 247…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Tickle v. State, 801 So. 2d 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)