PHILIP DEPASQUALE, APPELLANT,
v.
FATIMA UPEGUI, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Philip Depasquale (Depasquale) appeals the trial courts order vacating a signed and sealed mediation agreement. We reverse.
At a court ordered mediation, the parties reached a settlement agreement. The agreement was reduced to writing and executed by both sides and their attorneys. Having met the requirements of Florida Rule Civil Procedure 1.730(b), we find this to be a binding settlement agreement. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.730(b); Jordan v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt Inc., 656 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). As there was no basis to set aside the mediation agreement, we determine the trial court committed reversible error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the mediation agreement.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Yoanky DE LA OSA v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 208 So. 3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…s the word “judgment” to include all such orders. For whatever reason,10 the drafters chose not to employ the definitional scheme of either the Federal or appellate rules and we should not fix the omission through deci-sional law. Limbaugh v. State, 887 So. 2d 387, 395 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“Judges are not meant to be fixers of statutory omissions and have no authority to fill statutory voids or enlarge the domain of statutes already adopted .... This means that Judges are not free to reconstruct statutes deal…
-
Frank v. State, 912 So. 2d 329 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…person’s private life...." . An individual’s constitutional right of privacy in medical records is not implicated by the State's seizure and review of medical records under a valid search warrant without prior notice or hearing. Limbaugh v. State, 887 So. 2d 387, 397 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), review denied, 903 So. 2d 189 (Fla.2005). Consequently, the State has an available alternative if for some reason it is unwilling, or, unable, to comply with the requirements of section 395.3025(4)(d).…
-
Zivitz v. Zivitz, 16 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…aking up permanent abode elsewhere at a distant place). Third, if the legislature had intended to allow a garnishment defendant to assert a belated homestead exemption claim, it would have so provided in section 77.041. Cf., e.g., Limbaugh v. State, 887 So. 2d 387, 394 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (“[W]e take the omission of any reference to search warrants [in the statute] as a plain legislative decision that search warrants for medical records are not affected by these [statutory] provisions.”) (citing Dobbs v. Sea…
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Richard R. Jordan, M.D. v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., 656 So. 2d 200 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)