MICHAEL SAMUEL, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Rico Emmanuel Sloss v. State, 925 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
  …Therefore, the experts’ testimony, based in part on personal interviews with Sloss and reports of sexual offenses for which Sloss was adjudicated guilty and that Sloss acknowledged in a deposition, presented a jury question. See Donaldson v. State, 888 So. 2d 107, 109-10 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); see also Westerheide v. State, 831 So. 2d 93, 97 (Fla.2002) (plurality opinion). With respect to hearsay, section 394.9155(5) provides: Hearsay evidence, including reports of a member of the multidisciplinary team or re…
• Galloway v. State, 900 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …or commitment. The disputed expert testimony created a jury question on the issue of whether Galloway was a sexually violent predator and, accordingly, the trial court properly denied Galloway’s motion for a directed verdict. See Donaldson v. State, 888 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). In closing, we rióte that the dissent’s concern over the “scanty factual basis” for the State’s expert diagnosis appears to be nothing more than a re-weighing of the conflicting evidence presented below. Such conflicts were prop…

Authorities Cited

• Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
• Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)