RAYMOND RUIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES CROSBY, JR., SECRETARY, ETC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Raymond Ruiz, an incarcerated inmate, sought mandamus relief in the wrong judicial circuit. The trial court dismissed his petition but for the wrong reason—the court erroneously held that mandamus petitions against the Department of Corrections must be filed in the county where the prisoner is housed, when the correct venue is Leon County where the department is headquartered.
The proper venue for a petition for mandamus against the Department of Corrections is Leon County in the Second Judicial Circuit, where the department is headquartered, as trial courts must apply the home venue privilege of state agencies. The trial court's dismissal was correct but for the wrong reason.
[1] A petition for writ of mandamus against a state agency must be filed in the county where the agency maintains its headquarters, unless an exception to the home venue priv…
[2] A trial court errs in dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus solely on the basis that the petitioner is incarcerated in a different county than where the petition was…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“mandamus relief is not available in this court since the petitioner is presently incarcerated at the Jackson Correctional Institution in Malone, Florida. A Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be filed in the county where the prisoner is housed.”
The trial court's erroneous reasoning for dismissing the petition
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRaymond Ruiz is incarcerated at Jackson Correctional Institute in Malone, Florida, located in the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit. He filed a petition for…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Compel cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, J.
Raymond Ruiz seeks review of an order of the circuit court that dismissed his petition for writ of mandamus and/or motion to compel, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.630. We affirm without prejudice.
Ruiz is incarcerated by the Florida Department of Corrections (“department”) at the Jackson Correctional Institute in Malone, Florida, which is in the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit. He filed his petition for writ of mandamus and/or motion to compel in the Circuit Court of the Seventh Judicial Circuit in and for Putnam County, Florida, because he was adjudicated and sentenced there. The trial court dismissed his petition and motion finding that it lacked jurisdiction. The trial court wrote “mandamus relief is not available in this court since the petitioner is presently incarcerated at the Jackson Correctional Institution in Malone, Florida. A Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be filed in the county where the prisoner is housed. Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).” (emphasis supplied). After reviewing Stovall, we find that the trial court misread its holding.
In Stovall, the appellant, an inmate at Polk Correctional Institution, filed a complaint against two department employees in Polk County, alleging that they had violated his constitutional rights. Id. at 6-7. The trial court granted the department’s motion to transfer venue to Leon County where the department maintains its headquarters. Id. at 7. In affirming, the district court wrote:
Accordingly, we recede from our early decisions to the extent that they hold venue in a mandamus proceeding lies in the county where the prisoner is housed, and we affirm the trial court’s order transferring venue to Leon County.
Id. at 9. (emphasis supplied).
In the instant case, the trial court was correct that the petition was improperly filed in the Seventh Judicial Circuit. However, the trial court erred when it ruled that the petition had to be filed in the county where Ruiz is incarcerated. In Florida Dept. of Children and Families v. Sun-Sentinel, Inc., 865 So. 2d 1278 (Fla.2004), the supreme court held that a trial court must apply the home venue privilege of a state agency, unless one of the exceptions to the rule is satisfied. Id. at 1288. The proper venue for Ruiz’s petition for mandamus is Leon County in the Second Judicial Circuit because the department is headquartered in Leon County, and trial courts are bound to apply the department’s privilege. Id. Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Jacksonville Elec. Authority v. Clay County Utility Authority, 802 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). See also Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Stovall, 860 So. 2d at 9.
We affirm the dismissal without prejudice for Ruiz to file a petition for writ of mandamus in Leon County.
AFFIRMED.
SHARP, W., and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cunningham v. State, 968 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…t to the original sentencing order, then appellant can file a petition for writ of mandamus in the Second Judicial Circuit in Leon County. Bush v. State, 945 So. 2d 1207 (Fla.2006); Pugh v. State, 954 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Ruiz v. Crosby, 888 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); see also Rood v. State, 790 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (recognizing that DOC does not have authority to reject credit specifically ordered by the trial court as part of the sentence). Affirmed as Modified. SHAHOOD, C.J.,…
Authorities Cited
- Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Stovall v. Sergeant William Cooper, 860 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Fla. Dep't OF Child. & Families v. Sun-Sentinel, Inc., 865 So. 2d 1278 (Fla. 2004)
- Davidson v. Crosby, 883 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
- Leggs v. State, 802 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
- Jacksonville Elec. Auth. v. Clay Cnty. Util. Auth., 802 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)