CONSUMERS ALLIANCE CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

HENRY R. CARRILLO, YOLANDO A. CARRILLO, THE UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF HENRY R. CARRILLO, THE UNKOWN SPOUSE OF YOLANDO A. CARRILLO, CONSECO FINANCE SERVICING CORP., GATEWAY ESTATES PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., AND UNKNOWN TENANTS, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• GEICO Indem. Co. & GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Perez, 260 So. 3d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)
  …ng to GEICO under the particular circumstances of this case. GEICO also argued (incorrectly, as discussed infra ) that an insurer cannot write UM coverage out of an automobile policy for non-scheduled vehicles. GEICO relies upon Larusso v. Garner, 888 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) and Mangual v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 719 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) to support its argument that GEICO was entitled to rely upon the UM rejection form solely because the Department had approved it. Those…
• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Marielle Lyde, 267 So. 3d 453 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)
• State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Wilson, 330 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)
  …tion/rejection form is inconsistent with the policy and would lead the signor to believe that under these facts and circumstances, there would be coverage." State Farm moved for reconsideration, relying upon section 627.727(9) and Larusso v. Garner, 888 So. 2d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), to argue that the trial court was not empowered to scrutinize the text of the OIR-approved form "for the purpose of invalidating policy language that the court deems inadequately explained in the form." The trial court denied St…