THE STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
TOMAS A. RIERA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the circuit court appellate decision correctly reversed the trial court's denial of a speedy trial continuance, leading to the defendant's discharge.
The State sought certiorari review after the circuit court reversed a trial court's denial of a continuance, finding the State's repeated failure to p…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Recapture Period cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We deny the State’s petition for certiorari review of the circuit court appellate decision which reversed the trial court’s denial of a state-charged continuance, thereby discharging the defendant upon the expiration of the speedy trial period. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.191.
The circuit court, sitting in its appellate capacity, followed the essential requirements of the law. The defense had been diligent in preparing its case and demanding discovery; the state was not similarly diligent as it repeatedly failed to provide essential discovery as requested by defense counsel, and was repeatedly admonished by the trial court for failing to do so. The state’s inordinate failure to provide fundamental and valuable discovery until the very last day of the speedy trial recapture period reasonably and effectively prejudiced the defense in preparation of its case, and would delay the trial date past all of the speedy trial deadlines. Under the circumstances, the defense properly refused to waive its speedy trial rights.
Given the facts of this case, discharge of the defendant was the proper remedy under the speedy trial rule. Any other result would compromise the purposes of the speedy trial rule, and set a precedent for allowing the state to delay providing requested discovery with no concomitant penalty. It would also, in some cases, force defense counsel to compromise its preparation of a fair and competent defense.
Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cliff Ross Dixon v. State, 901 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…the Circuit Court’s decision denying the defendant’s writ of prohibition and denying defendant’s motion to discharge and order the defendant discharged as “any other result would compromise the purposes of the speedy trial rule.” See State v. Riera, 888 So. 2d 761, 762 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). We reverse the lower court’s order denying the writ of prohibition and order the defendant discharged. . At the March 4, 2002 trial the following transpired: Clerk: He [defense counsel] was here this morning. Court: Yes,…