CORDE CURRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CORDE CURRY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
889 So. 2d 221
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
In this direct criminal appeal, appellant raises two issues: (1) whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that it could infer guilty knowledge from a defendant’s unexplained possession of recently stolen property; and (2) whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting collateral crime evidence. We affirm as to the first issue because the argument made on appeal was not presented to the trial court, see, e.g., Citrrington v. State, 711 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Russell v. State, 858 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Currington); and as to the second issue because we conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
AFFIRMED.
BARFIELD, WEBSTER and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Escambia Cnty. v. U.I.L. Fam. Ltd. P'ship, 915 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…miss this appeal as premature, without prejudice, because the trial court’s order determined entitlement to attorney’s fees but reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount. See Benton v. Moore, 655 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Dockery v. Hood, 889 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). DISMISSED. ERVIN, DAVIS and BENTON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Currington v. State, 711 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
- Russell v. State, 858 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)