BYRON R. CLAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BYRON R. CLAY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
889 So. 2d 985
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2004)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, without prejudice to appellant filing in the trial court a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion that identifies specific non-hearsay, record evidence that supports his claim. Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla.2002); Wachter v. State, 868 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Appellant may raise the alleged violation of Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), in a rule 3.850 motion if he can establish a valid exception to the two-year time limitation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).
FARMER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla. 1993)
- Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 2002)
- Wachter v. State, 868 So. 2d 629 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)