RAYMOND BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Criminal Procedure 3.800(B)(2) cases and more on FLexlaw
SALCINES, Judge.
Raymond Brooks appeals the order of the trial court which revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to two concurrent terms of fifteen years’ imprisonment followed by two concurrent terms of fifteen years’ probation. We affirm the trial court’s decision to revoke Brooks’ community supervision. However, during oral argument before this court, the State conceded that the sentences imposed contain a scrivener’s error which must be corrected. The error was preserved through the filing of a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). Accordingly, we reverse the sentences imposed and remand for the trial court to impose sentences which comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.704(d)(27). Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
DAVIS and CANADY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shepherd v. State, 932 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006)…d prevent him from preserving his entitlement to controlled release. This court affirmed the summary denial of Shepherd’s original rule 3.850 motion but reversed for the newly added claim to be considered as a rule 3.800(a) claim. Shepherd v. State, 890 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). On remand, in considering the newly added claim under rule 3.800(a), the post-conviction court failed to consider whether Shepherd’s claim was, in fact, facially sufficient. The posteonviction court addressed the merits of Sheph…
-
Shepherd v. State, 998 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…sentences, the life sentence for murder was imposed as a habitual offender sentence. In two more written opinions, this court expressed concern with Mr. Shepherd’s sentences. Shepherd v. State, 932 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shepherd v. State, 890 So. 2d 333 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). In our opinion in 2006, we expressly explained that the sentence for first-degree murder entered in 1998 could not be treated as a habitual offender sentence. We affirmed, but gave Mr. Shepherd the right to try again in the trial…