LAKESIDE COMMUNITY CHAPEL OF CLEARWATER, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

O.J. MITCHELL, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ortega-Mantilla v. State, 898 So. 2d 1164 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …s.”).4 Accordingly, there is no basis to reverse the judgment on this ground. See Chase v. Cowart, 102 So. 2d 147, 150 (Fla.1958) (holding that result in trial court must be affirmed if right, even if right for wrong reason). See also Byers v. Ritz, 890 So. 2d 343, 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (same). V For his next issue on appeal, the appellant argues that the use of the term “sexually violent predator” should have been excluded both from the trial and the jury instructions because of its prejudicial and inflam…
• 50 State Sec. Serv., Inc. v. Lili Carissa Giangrandi, 132 So. 3d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)
  …efendant’s negligence, the harm would not have occurred, the proximate cause element of a negligence action is concerned with whether and to what extent a defendant’s conduct foreseeably and substantially caused the plaintiffs injury. Byers v. Ritz, 890 So. 2d 343, 347-48 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (en banc); see also Davis v. Bruhaspati, 917 So. 2d 350, 351-52 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (noting the distinction between cause-in-fact and proximate cause and reiterating that proximate cause focuses on foreseeability). The es…
• Woodson v. Ivey, 917 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
  …da courts interpret the Act broadly to preserve immunity in the face of sometimes egregious acts by employers and managers, as long as those acts fall short of intentional torts, culpable negligence or serious criminal misconduct. See Byers v. Ritz, 890 So. 2d 343, 347 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); see also Mekamy Oaks, Inc. v. Snyder, 659 So. 2d 1290, 1291 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (holding that employer retained worker’s compensation immunity where supervisor removed safety switch from lawnmower, causing plaintiff to be th…

Authorities Cited

• Sagaz Indus., Inc. v. Martin, 706 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)