GEVITY HR, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2005-01-11
No. 1D03-4165
WOLF, C.J., WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.
890 So. 2d 538 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asserts that the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) erred in overturning the decision of the appeals referee disqualifying the claimant from receiving unemployment benefits. The UAC wrongfully rejected findings of the appeals referee which were based on competent substantial evidence. See Walz v. Reggie’s Seafood & BBQ House, Inc., 718 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

Accordingly, we reverse the order of the UAC and direct the UAC to enter an order consistent with the decision of the appeals referee.

WOLF, C.J., WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • A.M.W. v. State, 934 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …ony of Sayles and Brinson constituted competent, substantial evidence from which the trier of fact could find that the elements of the crimes were established beyond a reasonable doubt, without an undue pyramiding of inferences. See Bender v. State, 890 So. 2d 538, 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (affirming conviction because, where defendant possessed stolen checks from the burglarized home, the case involved a number of facts from which one inference was made). A.M.W. next argues that most of his delinquency adjud…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw