KEITH DIAMOND AND DEBORAH DIAMOND, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CT., ET AL., APPELLEES/ CROSS-APPELLANTS
KEITH DIAMOND AND DEBORAH DIAMOND, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CT., ET AL., APPELLEES/ CROSS-APPELLANTS
890 So. 2d 1248
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING and MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
PER CURIAM.
The opinion filed October 27, 2004 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in its place.
We reverse the trial court’s order which struck The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, Ct.’s proposal for settlement in an action by the Diamonds under a valuable items policy. See U.S. Security Ins. Co. v. Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), rev. dismissed, 796 So. 2d 532 (Fla.2001)(The offer of judgment statute applies to all civil actions for damages.).
The motion for clarification is denied.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Schmitz v. Schmitz, 950 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)…trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding the wife only a portion of her attorney’s fees, in computing the award of attorney’s fees to the husband, and in denying the wife appellate attorney’s fees following remand in Schmitz v. Schmitz, 890 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), we affirm as to those issues. STEVENSON, C.J., and WARNER, J., concur.…
-
Sacks v. Sacks, 991 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…eceive the report within a reasonable period of time prior to trial so that each can properly evaluate the report, undertake discovery, where appropriate, and have an adequate opportunity for preparation of rebuttal evidence. See Schmitz v. Schmitz, 890 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Robinson v. Robinson, 713 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Miller v. Miller, 671 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Crifaci v. Crifaci, 626 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Fredricks v. Fredricks, 575 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); C…
Authorities Cited
- Castano v. State, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
- U.S. Sec. Ins. Co. v. Liliana Cahuasqui, 760 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)
- Liliana Cahuasqui v. U.S. Sec. Ins. Co., 796 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 2001)