MICHAEL MIDDLETON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL MIDDLETON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
890 So. 2d 1252
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Williams v. State, 888 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Burgal v. State, 888 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Steiner Transocean Ltd. v. Milena Efremova, 109 So. 3d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)…450 So. 2d 1253 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). . See, e.g., Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So. 2d 499 (Fla.1989). . Kinney Sys., Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 674 So. 2d 86 (Fla.1996); Fla. R. App. P. 1.061. . See, e.g., Barclays Bank, PLC v. Munoz, 890 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Nat’l Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co., 238 So. 2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). .In fact, federal courts treat a motion to dismiss based on a forum selection clause as a question of proper…
-
Middleton v. State, 95 So. 3d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 901 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 900 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 890 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 879 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (table) (affirming denial of Rule 3.800 motion); Middleton v. State, 844 So. 2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (affirming without prejudice den…
Authorities Cited
- Westerheide v. State, 888 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
- Burgal v. State, 888 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
- Williams v. State, 888 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)