MICHAEL C. ALFORD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL C. ALFORD, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
890 So. 2d 1276
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, Michael C. Alford, was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a third degree felony. See § 784.021, Fla. Stat. (2003). Because the judgment rendered by the trial court indicates that he was convicted of a second degree felony, we remand for correction of the judgment. In all other respects the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.
THOMPSON, ORFINGER, and MONACO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Boca Burger, Inc. v. Forum, 912 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 2005)…78, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). . The State conceded error in the following opinions published since the beginning of 2004: Brown v. State, 893 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Santiago v. State, 893 So. 2d 688 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Washington v. State, 890 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); King v. State, 891 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Card v. State, 889 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Walker v. State, 886 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Long v. State, 886 So. 2d 280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Stewart v. State, 884…
-
Petscher v. State, 936 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…trial court summarily denied the motion without explanation or supporting attachments. When a rule 3.800(a) motion states a legally sufficient claim for additional jail credit, a summary denial requires supporting attachments. Washington v. State, 890 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Friss v. State, 881 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Because the trial court failed to attach sufficient portions of the record to refute McIntosh’s claim for additional jail credit, we reverse and remand this matter with directio…
-
McINTOSH v. State, 914 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…trial court summarily denied the motion without explanation or supporting attachments. When a rule 3.800(a) motion states a legally sufficient claim for additional jail credit, a summary denial requires supporting attachments. Washington v. State, 890 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Friss v. State, 881 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Because the trial court failed to attach [*512] sufficient portions of the record to refute McIntosh’s claim for additional jail credit, we reverse and remand this matter with d…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence