CHRISTOPHER SHEELY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jail Credit cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion seeking additional jail credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant’s claim is not cognizable under rule 3.800(a) because he relies on an extra-record document, rather than record portions, to establish his entitlement to relief, and thus, his claim would require an evidentiary hearing to resolve. Clark v. State, 851 So. 2d 826, 827 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla.1998). Thus, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s right to seek relief regarding any additional jail credit due to him in a timely filed motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Benitez v. State, 744 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999).
AFFIRMED.
ERVIN and BENTON, JJ., concur; KAHN, J., concurs in result only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brady v. State, 910 So. 2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Dawson v. State, 816 So. 2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Sheely v. State, 891 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). KAHN, C.J., WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.…
-
Finch v. State, 4 So. 3d 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Sheely v. State, 891 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Burchfield [*712] v. State, 907 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). BARFIELD, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1998)
- Cross v. State, 851 So. 2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)
- Lutz v. KEY Towers S. Owners Ass'n, Inc., 744 So. 2d 1131 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)