JONATHAN STEELE, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES V. CROSBY, JR., SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2004-12-23
No. 1D04-4686
WOLF, C.J, WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ, concur.
891 So. 2d 1096 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2004) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Opinion of the Court
per curiam:.

per curiam:.

DENIED. Powell v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

WOLF, C.J, WEBSTER and HAWKES, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Aaron v. Palatka Mall, L.L.C., 908 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
    …ligence actions, summary judgment should be entered with great caution. See Moore v. Morris, 475 So. 2d 666, 668 (Fla.1985) (“Summary judgments should be cautiously granted in negligence and malpractice suits.”) (citation omitted); Feagle v. Purvis, 891 So. 2d 1096, 1098 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“[W]hen considering fact-intensive negligence cases, summary judgments should only be granted with caution.”) (citation omitted); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Tracz, 799 So. 2d 413, 414 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“Summary judgment p…
  • Leonidas Abreu v. F.E. Dev. Recycling, Inc., 35 So. 3d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
    …“As a general rule, the operator of an automobile, vessel or other mode of transportation who unexpectedly loses consciousness or becomes incapacitated is not chargeable with negligence as a result of his or her loss of control.” Feagle v. Purvis, 891 So. 2d 1096, 1098-99 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (citations omitted); see also, Bridges [*969] v. Speer, 79 So. 2d 679 (Fla.1955) (“It is not even simple negligence if one has a sudden attack, loses control of his car and causes an accident if he had no premonition or…
  • Marcum v. Hayward, 136 So. 3d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …433 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); see also Bridges v. Speer, 79 So. 2d 679, 681 (Fla.1955) (“It is not even simple negligence if one has a sudden attack, loses control of his car and causes an accident if he had no premonition or warning.”); Feagle v. Purvis, 891 So. 2d 1096, 1098-99 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (“As a general rule, the operator of an automobile, vessel or other mode of transportation who unexpectedly loses consciousness or becomes incapacitated is not chargeable with negligence as a result of his or her loss of…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw