D'ANDRE ROLACK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2005-02-02
No. 3D02-2624
Before GERSTEN and SUAREZ, JJ. and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
891 So. 2d 1192 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Schopp, 653 So. 2d 1016 (Fla.1995); Perkins v. State, 438 So. 2d 873 (Fla.1983).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sundaram v. State, 970 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Perez v. State, 934 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Zelaya v. State, 891 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). PALMER, C.J., PLEUS and ORFÍNGER, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw