HARLAN L. MILLER, APPELLANT,
v.
JULIE MILLER, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sanctions For Discovery Violations cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We reverse the trial court’s order finding former husband in contempt for failure to pay child support because it was based on an earlier discovery sanction order striking his pleadings to contempt, precluding him from defending on the grounds of his inability to pay. See Chase v. Chase, 519 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988) (trial court erred by finding husband’s ability to pay was “taken to be established” based on discovery sanction striking his pleadings even though sanction itself was within its discretion).
In a civil contempt proceeding, the trial court cannot incarcerate, even if only coer-cively, without providing the contemnor the opportunity to prove his inability to comply. That means the court cannot use discovery sanctions as a basis for finding an inability to comply. We remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
FARMER, C.J., SHAHOOD J. and GREENE, CHARLES M., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bargiel v. Colt Studio, Inc., 901 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…very orders. In fact, petitioner has argued that he was not given an opportunity to provide the hard copy documents the court ordered on February 1, 2005 because the court also ordered his incarceration at the same time. We said in Miller v. Miller, 891 So. 2d 1201, 1201 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), “In a civil contempt proceeding, the trial court cannot incarcerate, even if only coercively, without providing the contemnor the opportunity to prove his inability to comply.” It is also settled that a trial court must af…
Authorities Cited
- Chase v. Chase, 519 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)