ROBERT FITZGERALD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2005-01-24
No. 1D04-2647
BENTON, LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
892 So. 2d 541 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005) Negative Treatment
Cited by 9 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s summary denial of Appellant’s postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record to conclusively refute Appellant’s claim of misadvice, we reverse. We affirm all other issues raised on appeal without further discussion.

In his motion, Appellant made a facially sufficient claim that his counsel misadvised him about the consequences of testifying. Jennings v. State, 685 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). The trial court improperly relied on extra-record information to deny Appellant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. Mims v. State, 672 So. 2d 662 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We, therefore, reverse the trial court’s summary denial of this claim and remand either for further attachment of record portions to refute Appellant’s claim or for an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED, in part, REVERSED, in part, and REMANDED.

BENTON, LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Akins, 69 So. 3d 261 (Fla. 2011)
    …he HFO status amounted to a double jeopardy violation under this Court’s decision in Ashley v. State (Ashley II), 850 So. 2d 1265, 1267 (Fla.2003); (3) the subsequent imposition of the HFO status is inconsistent with the decisions in White v. State, 892 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st [*267] DCA 2005), and Evans v. State, 675 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); (4) Akins is distinguishable from O’Neal v. State, 862 So. 2d 91 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); (5) the trial court’s amendments to Akins’ sentence did not amount to the mere…
    1 / 3
  • Akins v. State, 98 So. 3d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
    …shley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265 (Fla.2003), and Evans v. State, 675 So. 2d 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), as well as by discussion in this court’s opinion in Barron v. State, 827 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), and by the outcome in White [*61] v. State, 892 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Although we disagree with at least part of the analysis in Evans, it was approved by the supreme court in Ashley. We are not convinced that we can distinguish these cases. Accordingly, we reverse the order on appeal and hold tha…
    1 / 2
  • Bright v. State, 936 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
    …PER CURIAM. We reverse appellant’s sentence, because it exceeds the five-year statutory maximum for a third-degree felony, and remand for resentencing. See Ashley v. State, 850 So. 2d 1265 (Fla.2003); White v. State, 892 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). REVERSE and REMAND for further consistent proceedings. ERVIN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw