JEREMIAH ALGUNO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant Alguno appeals summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief based on trial counsel's affirmative misadvice regarding immigration consequences of his guilty plea. The court reverses and remands, holding that claims of affirmative misadvice on collateral consequences like citizenship eligibility constitute legally cognizable grounds for post-conviction relief.
Trial counsel's affirmative misadvice on citizenship and other collateral consequences of a plea constitutes a legally cognizable claim for post-conviction relief. The motion was timely filed within two years of discovering counsel's error. Summary denial was improper where the allegations were not refuted by the record.
[1] Affirmative misadvice from trial counsel regarding the collateral consequences of a guilty plea, such as its impact on citizenship, constitutes a legally cognizable groun…
[2] A motion for post-conviction relief alleging affirmative misadvice by counsel concerning the collateral consequences of a plea is timely if filed within two years of the…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[QUOTE REDACTED — failed verbatim audit (paraphrase, not verbatim). See original_text for the text as originally displayed.]”
Establishes the distinction between no duty to advise about collateral consequences and affirmative misadvice, which is actionable.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceIn June 1995, Alguno pleaded guilty to sale of marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to sell; adjudication was withheld and he received pr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Affirmative Misadvice Of Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Jeremiah Alguno appeals a trial court order summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand for the reasons that follow.
In June 1995, Alguno pleaded guilty to sale of marijuana in case no. 95-3958 and to possession of marijuana with intent to sell in case no. 95-3959. The trial court withheld adjudication in both cases and placed him on drug offender probation for eighteen months. Alguno did not appeal.
On July 8, 2003, Alguno filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging that he had received notification from the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service that it had decided on July 11, 2001 to deny his application for naturalization. The decision was based on the case for possession of marijuana with intent to sell, which INS regarded as a conviction, and an ‘aggravated felony’ under immigration laws. Alguno alleged in his motion for post-conviction relief that he entered his pleas in the two cases based on the affirmative misadvice of his trial counsel who advised that Alguno’s pleas would not jeopardize his chances of becoming a U.S. citizen. Alguno alleged that he was prejudiced by this affirmative misadvice when the INS denied his application for naturalization in July 2001.
Appellant’s claim is timely. See Peart v. State, 756 So. 2d 42 (Fla.2000). The original motion was filed within two years of when Alguno allegedly discovered that his counsel’s affirmative misadvice was erroneous, and the amended motion to include the required oath was filed within a few weeks from the order dismissing his original motion without prejudice. See Love v. State, 814 So. 2d 475, 477 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(citing Bethune v. State, 774 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)).
On the merits, we find that the trial court erred in summarily denying this motion. Although the trial court and defense counsel are under no obligation to advise the defendant of the collateral consequences of a plea, see Major v. State, 814 So. 2d 424, 426 (Fla.2002), claims of trial counsel’s affirmative misadvice on citizenship and other collateral consequences have been held to be legally cognizable grounds for post-conviction relief. See e.g. State v. Sallato, 519 So. 2d 605, 606 (Fla.1988) (attempt to become a citizen). See also Bates v. State, 887 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2004) (Pariente, C.J., concurring specially) (sentence enhancements); Weir v. State, 823 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (threat of deportation); Ghanavati v. State, 820 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (same); Joyner v. State, 795 So. 2d 267, 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (right to vote); Roberti v. State, 782 So. 2d 919, 920 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (involuntary commitment as a sexual predator).
Because the motion for post-conviction relief stated a legally cognizable claim, and the record does not refute the allegations herein, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. See Weir, 823 So. 2d at 246 (remanding for evidentiary hearing where defendant claimed his attorney affirmatively misadvised defendant concerning the collateral consequences of a plea where adjudication was withheld).
GUNTHER, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Owran Green, 944 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 2006)…alleging a rule 3.172(c)(8) violation can be filed many years after the plea. Green filed his motion to withdraw his 1993 plea in 2002, within months after denial of the application to waive grounds for excludability. Similarly, in Alguno v. State, 892 So. 2d 1200, (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), the Fourth District ruled that a 2003 motion seeking to withdraw a 1995 plea and alleging that INS had denied his application for naturalization in 2001 stated a legally cognizable claim. Id. at 1201-02. Precedent in which mot…
-
Chaidez v. United States, 568 U.S. 342 (U.S. 2013)…representation exception to the collateral consequence rule”); People v. Correa, 108 Ill. 2d 541, 550-552, 485 N. E. 2d 307, 311 (1985); People v. McDonald, 1 N. Y. 3d 109, 113- [*367] 115, 802 N. E. 2d 131, 134-135 (2003); see also Alguno v. State, 892 So. 2d 1200, 1201 (Fla. App. 2005) (per curiam); State v. Rojas-Martinez, 2005 UT 86, ¶¶ 15-20, 125 P. 3d 930, 933-935; In re Yim, 139 Wash. 2d 581, 588, 989 P. 2d 512, 516 (1999). The majority cites a law review article for the proposition that the categorica…
Authorities Cited
- Roan Peart v. State, 756 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 2000)
- Daron Merritt v. State, 814 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2002)
- Bates v. State, 887 So. 2d 1214 (Fla. 2004)
- LaMarr Love v. State, 814 So. 2d 475 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- State v. Sallato, 519 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1988)
- Assadollah Ghanavati v. State, 820 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- Roberti v. State, 782 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Bethune v. State, 774 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Darron Joyner v. State, 795 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
- Weir v. State, 823 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)