ROBERT A. KING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The appellant’s convictions are affirmed. However, to the extent that the appellant’s sentence for case number 01-0013 fails to comply with Gethers v. State, 838 So. 2d 504 (Fla.2003), it is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for the appropriate award of jail credit. The evidence before the trial court at the hearing demonstrated that the arrest warrant for case number 01-0013 was executed while the appellant was in the Jackson County Jail, and he is therefore entitled to the additional jail credit on that case. See Gethers, 838 So. 2d at 507. However, because there was no testimony regarding the execution of an arrest warrant for case number 00-4961, the trial court did not err in failing to award any additional jail credit other than the 102 days the appellant served in the Leon County Jail.
Accordingly, the appellant’s sentence for case number 01-0013 is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for the limited purpose of awarding the appropriate amount of jail credit.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
WEBSTER, BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Shenfeld v. State, 14 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009)…initiates a proceeding under the Environmental Dispute Resolution Act was procedural in nature). To the extent that our decision conflicts with the First District’s decisions in Frye v. State, 885 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) and Harris v. State, 893 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), we certify a conflict.1 We do hold, however, that the trial court erred by sentencing Shenfeld to fif [*1025] teen years in prison after he had received a true split sentence of five years. In Poore v. State, 531 So. 2d 161 (F…
-
Shenfeld v. State, 44 So. 3d 96 (Fla. 2010)…the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Shenfeld v. State, 14 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009), in which the Fourth District certified that its decision is in direct conflict with the decisions of the First District Court of Appeal in Harris v. State, 893 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), and Frye v. State, 885 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we agree with the Fourth District that the application of the statutory amendment to a…
-
Willy Palmer v. State, 37 So. 3d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…il well after the statutory change. See Harper v. State, 955 So. 2d 617, 618 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). To the extent that our decision conflicts with the First District’s decisions in Frye v. State, 885 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) and Harris v. State, 893 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) regarding the crucial date, we certify a conflict.1 See Shenfeld v. State, 14 So. 3d 1021, 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (holding that retroactive application of the 2007 amendment to section 948.06(1)(d), Florida Statutes, did not co…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Gethers v. State, 838 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2003)