MARLENE EAST F/K/A MARLENE L. LAGUE, APPELLANT,
v.
DANIEL J. LAGUE, APPELLEE
MARLENE EAST F/K/A MARLENE L. LAGUE, APPELLANT,
DANIEL J. LAGUE, APPELLEE
893 So. 2d 706
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Marlene East, f/k/a Marlene Lague, appeals the trial court’s order denying her contempt relief for the failure of appellee Daniel Lague to pay into a college fund agreed upon in the dissolution settlement agreement. The parties’ settlement agreement unambiguously indicates that the provision concerning the children’s college fund was intended as a child support provision, and thus, contempt is an available enforcement tool. See Zern v. Zern, 737 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The trial court’s order is, therefore, REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings.
WOLF, C.J., KAHN and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. State, 911 So. 2d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…order denying Mr. Jackson’s motion for postconviction relief concerning a sexual predator designation. We affirmed, however, without prejudice to Mr. Jackson’s right to pursue any available civil remedies. Thereafter, as stated in Jackson v. State, 893 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005), [*233] Jackson filed a petition for declaratory judgment alleging that he was improperly designated as a sexual predator. The trial court denied Jackson’s petition without any discussion of the merits. The court found that Jackso…
-
Renoit Saintelien v. State, 990 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 2008)…predator designation); Jackson v. State, 801 So. 2d 212, 213 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (affirming the trial court’s order denying Jackson’s sexual predator designation challenge as improperly raised in a motion for postconviction relief); Jackson v. State, 893 So. 2d 706, 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (ultimately reversing the trial court’s order denying Jackson civil relief regarding his sexual predator designation)). Faced with the procedural impracticalities illuminated by Coblentz and Jackson, the Second District in Ki…
-
Mulvey v. Forman, 207 So. 3d 894 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…bstantial evidence.” Williams v. Gen. Ins. Co., 468 So. 2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). However, a trial court abuses its discretion where it fails to address the merits of a petition or complaint for declaratory judgment. Jackson v. [*897] State, 893 So. 2d 706, 707 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). “The circuit and county courts have jurisdiction within then’ respective jurisdictional amounts to declare rights, status, and other equitable or legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed.” § 86.0…
Authorities Cited
- Edmon Jones v. State, 737 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)