MARK PAUL GLOWACKI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sentencing Error cases and more on FLexlaw
VILLANTI, Judge.
We affirm Mark Glowacki’s conviction for DUI causing serious bodily injury but remand for entry of an order correcting certain sentencing errors.
While Glowacki’s appeal was pending, he filed a motion to correct sentencing errors, objecting to certain costs. The trial court granted this motion but did not enter a corrected judgment and sentence. Glo-wacki argues, and the State properly concedes, that the trial court must enter a new judgment and sentence indicating the objected-to costs have been stricken. We therefore reverse and remand for the ministerial entry of a corrected judgment and sentence at which Glowacki need not be present. See Windisch v. State, 709 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Celistics, LLC v. Gonzalez, 22 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…this Court’s standard of review is de novo. See Weisser v. PNC Bank, N.A., 967 So. 2d 827, 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); DVDPlay, Inc. v. DVD 123 LLC, 930 So. 2d 816, 818 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Regal Kitchens, Inc. v. O’Connor & Taylor Condo. Constr., Inc., 894 So. 2d 288, 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The trial court’s interpretation of the contractual venue provision presents a question of law. For this reason, our standard of review is de novo.”). “[C]ontracting parties have the right to select and agree on a forum in…
-
Pipitone v. Pipitone, 23 So. 3d 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…with mandatory language using “shall” or “may only”); Am. Boxing & Athletic Ass’n, Inc. v. Young, 911 So. 2d 862, 865 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (contrasting “may” with “must” and “shall”); cf. Regal Kitchens, Inc. v. O’Connor & Taylor Condo. Constr., Inc., 894 So. 2d 288, 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (holding provisions that a party “may” choose a particular venue to enforce a contractual right are not exclusive). Their agreement established a way that Ms. Diaz could ensure alimony payment. The lien remedy, therefore, is…
-
Michaluk v. Credorax (USA), Inc., 164 So. 3d 719 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…g Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. Stearns Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 874 So. 2d 1231, 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)). Absent words of exclusivity, a forum selection clause will be deemed permissive. Regal Kitchens, Inc. v. O’Connor & Taylor Condo. Constr., Inc., 894 So. 2d 288, 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005). For example, “[i]f the forum selection clause ‘states or clearly indicates that any litigation must or shall be initiated in specified forum,’ ” then the clause is mandatory and must be honored by the trial court in the abs…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Windisch v. State, 709 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)