DEANNA DOYLE-VALLERY, M.D., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
JULIE B. ARANIBAR, ET VIR., RESPONDENTS
DEANNA DOYLE-VALLERY, M.D., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
JULIE B. ARANIBAR, ET VIR., RESPONDENTS
894 So. 2d 875
Florida Supreme Court (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the decision in Doyle-Vallery v. Aranibar, 838 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decision in Allstate Insurance Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), which this Court subsequently approved in Sarkis v. Allstate Insurance Co., 863 So. 2d 210 (Fla.2003). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Sarkis.
It is so ordered.
PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Amendment TO Fla. Rule OF Juv. Procedure 8.165(a), 981 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 2008)…he reasons we gave at the time for declining to adopt this mandate were “[bjecause of the potential financial impact of the amendment ... and our desire to work cooperatively with the Legislature.” Amendments to the Fla. Rules of Juvenile Procedure, 894 So. 2d 875, 880-81 (Fla.2005). Now, the majority has decided to go ahead and adopt this amendment to rule 8.165(a). Instead of imposing this substantive change by amending a procedural rule, I believe we should continue to follow the recommendation of the Com…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Sarkis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 863 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 2003)
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Sarkis, 809 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Deanna Doyle-Vallery, M.D. v. Aranibar, 838 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)