STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,

v.

MARILYN HOLMES HERNDON, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. THOMAS P. MCCABE, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. JOE ALAN GOLAN, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. ERNEST LEE HARDY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. STEPHEN MURPHY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. DOMINGO SANCHEZ, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. JOHN BOOREAM, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. JEANNE BARBER, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. SCOTT W. KARO, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. WILLIAM F. GILBERT, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. THOMAS MILLS, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. ALEC RICARDO REEVES, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. PHILLIP WRIGHT, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. CATHERINE W. GREGORY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. MICHAL KEINZ, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. LAWRENCE STALEY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. ALFREDO PADILLA, JR., RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. MICHAEL WARREN TRUMBOWER, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. RAYMOND LYNN, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. REGINALD HENRY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. JOSEPH JONES, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. MELISSA J. SMILEY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. JUSTIN MURRAY, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. ORLANDO ADAMS, RESPONDENT; STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, V. RICHARD WILLIAMS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2005-02-17

Nos. SC03-828, SC03-912, SC03-928, SC03-929, SC03-930, SC03-937, SC03-941, SC03-962, SC03-972, SC03-993, SC03-994, SC03-1015, SC03-1163, SC03-1189, SC03-1386, SC03-1404, SC03-1406, SC03-1407, SC03-1807, SC03-1910, SC03-2036, SC03-2051, SC03-2284, SC03-2293, SC04-585

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur., QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

894 So. 2d 966 Florida Supreme Court (2005) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, C.J.

We have the decisions in each of these cases for review, based on express and direct conflict or certified conflict with a decision of this Court or another district court. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), (4), Fla. Const. We accept jurisdiction, consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion, summarily quash the decisions of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla.2004), and State v. Green, 887 So. 2d 1089 (Fla.2004). We decline to address the additional issues, including those relating to resentencing, raised in several of these cases.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

Dissent

QUINCE, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent for the same reasons expressed in my dissenting opinions in Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063, 1086-88 (Fla.2004), and State v. Green, 887 So. 2d 1089, 1090 (Fla.2004).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Martens v. State, 948 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)

…ed, does not authorize a mandatory minimum sentence. A post-conviction “claim that a mandatory minimum sentence was illegally imposed is cognizable.” Padilla v. State, 870 So. 2d 6, 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), quashed on other grounds by State v. Herndon, 894 So. 2d 966 (Fla.2005). We therefore reverse the postconviction court’s denial of claim one with respect to circuit court case number 79-03760 and remand with directions that the twenty-five-year mandatory minimum sentence for the robbery conviction be strick…

Authorities Cited

Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004)
State v. Green, 887 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 2004)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw