DAVID T. STEPHENS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID T. STEPHENS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
895 So. 2d 466
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Hartline v. State, 806 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (holding that a movant is not entitled to DNA testing when identity was not in question).
THOMPSON PALMER and 0RFINGER, JJ„ concur,
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Terance Valentine v. State, 98 So. 3d 44 (Fla. 2012)…s of the jury. See Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 608.6 (2012 ed.) (“[T]he credibility of a witness may be attacked by evidence tending to contradict a material fact stated in the testimony of the witness.”); see also Eaton Corp. v. Votour, 895 So. 2d 466, 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (explaining that a witness’s credibility is called into question when that witness is impeached by contradiction). Indeed, defense counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing that the use of the name Livia Porche and the po…
-
Med. Logistics, Inc. v. Marchines, 911 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)…actually be cut off, unless there is some good reason not to cut it off. The surveillance tapes in issue here were offered as substantive evidence, not as impeachment evidence. Compare Fla. Admin. Code R. 60Q-6.113(2) (2005); Eaton Corp. v. Votour, 895 So. 2d 466, 467 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). When the judge of compensation claims inquired, in the present case, why the surveillance tapes were not furnished to [*826] claimant’s counsel by the deadline, counsel for the employer and the carrier, responding that he…
Authorities Cited
- Hartline v. State, 806 So. 2d 595 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)