CHARLES HENRY MILLER, JR., PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
CHARLES HENRY MILLER, JR., PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
895 So. 2d 532
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Smith v. State, 187 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).
ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Morrison v. United States, 73 So. 3d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)…of the award. Consequently, that portion of appellants’ appeal is DISMISSED. See Zampell Refractories, Inc. v. Welch, 61 So. 3d 1160, 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28 So. 3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). See also Carlin v. Carlin, 895 So. 2d 532, 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding that a finding of entitlement to attorney’s fees without setting the amount is a non-final, non-appealable ruling). I concur, but write to acknowledge Appellants’ argument that under section 559.77(2), Florida Sta…
-
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP v. Ridgway, 143 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…able. We dismiss appellant’s appeal as to that portion of the judgment awarding attorney’s fees because the trial court reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount of such fees, rendering the award nonfinal and nonappealable. See Carlin v. Carlin, 895 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So. 2d 215 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). AFFIRMED in part, and DISMISSED in part. ROWE, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Earnest Donald Smith v. State, 187 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966)