JAMES ANTHONY JEFFERSON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wyeth/Pharma Field Sales & Gallagher Bassett v. Toscano, 40 So. 3d 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
  …this rationale, however, is the premise that the cause of a claimant’s displacement from employment and wages, once established, remains the cause unless an intervening or superseding cause is established. See generally IMC Phosphates Co. v. Prater, 895 So. 2d 1263, 1271 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (“When a primary injury is shown to have arisen out of and in the course of employment, every natural consequence of that injury likewise arises out of the employment unless it is the result of an independent intervening ca…
• James W. Windham Builders, Inc. v. Van Overloop, 951 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
  …benefits. Accordingly, the JCC made a factual finding that E/C’s actions were an attempt to hide behind a wall of willful ignorance. We agree. An employer must monitor a claimant’s injuries and provide needed benefits. IMC Phosphates Co. v. Prater, 895 So. 2d 1263 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). Although E/C argues that the applicable version of section 440.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2004), has precluded the duty to investigate attendant care until a written prescription is received, we find this reasoning unfounded. I…

Authorities Cited

• Miller Seabrooks v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
• Cooper v. State, 817 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)