STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL PAUL BOLTON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida's appellate court vacated a downward departure sentence for lewd and lascivious battery because the trial court failed to provide written reasons for a departure exceeding 25 percent from guideline recommendations.
A downward departure sentence exceeding 25 percent from guideline recommendations must be accompanied by written reasons, and absent such reasons, the sentence must be vacated and remanded for re-sentencing.
[1] A sentencing court must provide written reasons for any downward departure from guideline recommendations that exceeds 25 percent.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael Paul Bolton, age 21, pleaded guilty to two counts of lewd and lascivious battery involving 15-year-old girls, with the second offense committe…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Lewd Or Lascivious Battery cases and more on FLexlaw
PETERSON, J.
The State of Florida appeals the downward departure sentence imposed upon Michael Paul Bolton, 21 years of age, for one count of lewd and lascivious battery by having “consensual” sexual intercourse with a 15-year old girl. He repeated the crime with another 15-year old girl while he was on pre-trial release for the first crime.
After pleading guilty to both charges, he was sentenced downward to 365 days in the county jail followed by 10 years sex offender probation instead of the recommended 246 months in the Department of Corrections as indicated by his guideline scoresheet, but the sentencing judge failed to prepare written reasons for the departure. Any sentence imposed which varies downward from the recommended sentence by more than 25 percent must be accompanied by a written statement delineating the reasons for the departure.1
Because the record does not contain a written statement of the reasons for the departure that deviated more than 25 percent from the recommended guidelines, we must vacate the sentence and remand for re-sentencing within the guidelines unless the trial court can comply with the requirements of section 921.0016(l)(e).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
GRIFFIN and MONACO, JJ., concur. . See § 921.0016(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2003).