RICKEY LYN RISER, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rickey Lyn Riser, III was convicted of trespass, burglary with assault, and witness retaliation. On appeal, the court reversed certain sentencing components including court costs and public defender fees imposed without proper procedure, and reversed habitual violent felony offender sentences due to insufficient proof that predicate convictions involved deadly weapons.
The court reversed the $100 court costs assessment because the trial court failed to inquire into ability to pay without impairing restitution or child support obligations. The court reversed the $1,500 public defender fee because the trial court failed to advise Riser of his right to contest the amount. The court reversed the habitual violent felony offender sentences because the State failed to prove the predicate aggravated assault conviction involved a deadly weapon. The court held that jury findings regarding the timing of prior convictions are not required for habitual offender treatment.
[1] A trial court must inquire into a defendant's ability to pay court costs before imposing them, ensuring payment does not impair restitution or child support obligations.
[2] A defendant must be advised of their right to contest the amount of public defender fees before such fees are assessed.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We reverse the assessment of $100 in court costs pursuant to section 939.18, Florida Statutes (2001), because the trial court failed to first inquire into whether Riser had the ability to pay it without impairing his payment of restitution or child support.”
Establishes the requirement that trial courts must inquire into ability to pay court costs before assessment, considering impact on restitution and child support.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRiser was convicted of trespass, burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery, and retaliation against a witness. At sentencing, the trial court …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ability To Pay Court Costs cases and more on FLexlaw
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
Rickey Lyn Riser, III, was convicted of trespass, burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery, and retaliation against a witness. While his appeal was pending, he filed a motion to correct sentencing errors pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). The trial court determined that Riser was entitled to relief on several of his claims and twice extended its jurisdiction to resolve the issues. Because more than sixty days passed since the trial court’s last scheduled resentencing, the motion was deemed denied. For the most part, the State concedes error, and we reverse as explained below.
We reverse the assessment of $100 in court costs pursuant to section 939.18, Florida Statutes (2001), because the trial court failed to first inquire into whether Riser had the ability to pay it without impairing his payment of restitution or child support. On remand, the trial court may again impose this cost after complying with section 939.18. See Patterson v. State, 796 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001).
We reverse the assessment of $1500 for the public defender’s services because the trial court failed to advise Riser that he could contest the amount. On remand, Riser shall be given an opportunity to object to the amount. See Piasecki v. State, 704 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).
We also reverse the habitual violent felony offender sentences for burglary of a dwelling with an assault or battery and retaliation against a witness. To support habitual offender treatment, the State offered proof that Riser had previously been convicted of aggravated assault, but the State was required to show that the predicate conviction of aggravated assault was committed with a deadly weapon. See § 775.084(l)(b)(l)(g), Fla. Stat. (2001) (listing aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as a qualifying offense for habitual violent felony offender sentencing). Because Riser never objected to the sufficiency of the State’s proof, the State is allowed on remand to establish that Riser qualifies for habitual offender treatment. See Hardwick v. State, 677 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).
We see no merit to Riser’s argument that the jury must make a finding that the current offenses were committed within five years of the prior convictions. See Wright v. State, 780 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (rejecting argument that jury findings — as to existence of prior convictions for qualifying offenses committed within five years that were not vacated or pardoned — are necessary for habitual offender treatment); see also Grant v. State, 815 So. 2d 667, 668 n. 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (citing Wright with approval regarding habitual offender sentencing).
The convictions are affirmed. The habitual violent felony offender sentences are reversed, the specified costs are reversed, and the case is remanded for resentencing.
CASANUEVA and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Ransom Louis Collins, 985 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 2008)…prove two or more predicate felonies as required to habitualize); Rogers v. State, 944 So. 2d 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (resentencing ordered where State failed to provide competent evidence of date of defendant’s release from prison); Riser v. State, 898 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (resentencing ordered where State failed to show predicate offenses as enumerated in section 775.084, Florida Statutes); Cook v. State, 893 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (resentencing ordered where State failed to show that defen…
Authorities Cited
- Wright v. State, 780 So. 2d 216 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
- Patterson v. State, 796 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Grant v. State, 815 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)
- Ramel Mungin v. State, 677 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Hardwick v. State, 677 So. 2d 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Piasecki v. State, 704 So. 2d 1134 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)