DARROW BETHEL, PETITIONER,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND CHARLES MCCRAY, ETC., RESPONDENTS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the notation 'PN/IA' on the appearance bond, meaning Promissory Note/Indemnity Agreement, constituted acceptable collateral under Florida Statutes.
Defendant Bethel was arrested and released on a $5,000 appearance bond. The trial court revoked the bond, believing the defendant committed fraud rega…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Appearance Bond cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Darrow Bethel petitions for writ of ha-beas corpus. We grant the petition.
Defendant-petitioner Bethel was arrested for sale of marijuana. A bail bondsman posted a $5,000 appearance bond and the defendant was released.
In subsequent proceedings inquiring into the defendant’s assets for purpose of appointment of counsel, the court inquired about the bond. The defendant informed the court that he had paid the bail bond company $500 from his income tax refund. In response to the court’s question, the defendant stated that he had not posted any other collateral. Believing this to be a fraud on the court, the court revoked the bond and took the defendant into custody.
In the habeas proceedings here, the parties have directed this court’s attention to the portion of the appearance bond which contains a description of the collateral security. This contains the notation “PN/IA.” The public defender has represented that the abbreviation means Promissory Note/Indemnity Agreement.
Under subsection 648.442(1), Florida Statutes (2004), acceptable forms of security or indemnity include a promissory note or indemnity agreement. It follows that proper collateral has been posted in this case.
The defendant argues that a bail bond company is allowed to issue an appearance bond without requiring any security whatsoever. We need not reach that argument.
We grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus.
The defendant’s bond is hereby reinstated, and the defendant shall be released forthwith.
This ruling is effective immediately and will not be delayed by the filing of any post-decision motion.
Petition granted.