WILLIE JAMES CANADY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
WILLIE JAMES CANADY, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
898 So. 2d 1028
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
WOLF, C.J., BARFIELD and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Buhler v. Buhler, 913 So. 2d 767 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…ount of time” to mean “that the noncustodial parent exercises visitation at least 40 percent of the overnights of the year.” See Guttler v. Guttler, 798 So. 2d 888, 889 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Applying this provision is mandatory. Cheverie v. Cheverie, 898 So. 2d 1028, 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); see Seiberlich v. Wolf, 859 So. 2d 570, 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Migliore v. Harris, 848 So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Here, the visitation order reflects that the children will spend more than 40 percent of the…
-
Hayde v. Winnifred Hayde, 41 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)…a child to spend a “substantial” amount of time with each parent, the trial court “shall adjust any award of child support” in accordance with a formula set forth in the statute. The requirement of the statute is mandatory. See Cheverie v. Cheverie, 898 So. 2d 1028, 1029 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Seiberlich v. Wolf, 859 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Section 61.30(11)(b)8. defines “substantial” as meaning “that a parent exercises visitation at least 40 percent of the overnights of the year.” In the present ease…