LAURIE JEANNE KELLY, APPELLANT,
v.
GREGORY W. KELLY, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Full Disclosure cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
In this divorce case, Appellant challenges the trial court’s rulings on a variety of issues. We affirm on all but two points: First, the lower court erred in its calculation of Appellant’s share of the marital property. Appellant was awarded $858,147.93 as equitable distribution. As Appellee concedes on appeal, the correct equitable distribution award to Appellant, based on the findings of fact made by the trial judge, should have been $963,728.10. Secondly, the lower court never addressed Appellant’s contention that the prenuptial agreement was unenforceable due to a lack of full disclosure, duress or undue influence. Although conflicting evidence was presented on this point, the court expressed the view that a resolution of this disputed issue was unnecessary. This was error. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.
THOMPSON, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kelly v. Kelly, 925 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…rt affirmed the former wife’s appeal from the dissolution decree, but remanded for the lower court to address her contention that the prenuptial agreement was unenforceable due to a lack of full disclosure, duress or undue influence. Kelly v. Kelly, 898 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). . Driscoll v. Driscoll, 763 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).…
-
Contreras v. State, 910 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…e] to the direct examination or statement date should have no bearing on how the fact finder assimilates the direct and cross once these statements are admitted into evidence.” Blanton, 880 So. 2d at 801 (footnote omitted); see also State v. Causey, 898 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). I am aware of the First District Court of Appeal’s thorough analysis of the confrontation clause issue in Lopez v. State, 888 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). There, the First District determined that an unsworn pre-trial interv…
-
State v. Dulje, 903 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)…tiary rulings of the trial court contained in the order dated October 20, 2004, which it based on its interpretation of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Recently, we issued our decision in State v. Causey, 898 So. 2d 1096 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005), where similar rulings by the same trial judge were reversed. This order must also be vacated in light of Causey. WRIT GRANTED; ORDER VACATED. GRIFFIN, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.…