THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
RUDOLFO HERNANDEZ, REINALDO MUNIZ, RICARDO MUNIZ, REYNALDO HERNANDEZ, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unconstitutional Seizure cases and more on FLexlaw
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
The state appeals from an order suppressing marijuana found in the appellees’ residence. Upon an acceptable view of the record, the court concluded that the contraband had been unconstitutionally discovered and then seized only when, without cognizable “exigent circumstances,” cf. State v. Riggs, 890 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)(warrantless entry justified by founded concern for safety of occupants); Davis v. State, 834 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)(warrantless entry justified by reasonable suspicion that home had been burglarized), an officer, who was in their rear yard solely to return a dog that had been running loose, decided to open and peer through a sliding glass door at the rear of the house. We agree and affirm. See State v. Adams, 378 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Hornblower v. State, 351 So. 2d 716 (Fla.1977); Olivera v. State, 315 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So. 2d 21 (Fla.1976).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Martin v. Lens.com, Inc. (S.D. Fla. 2024)…And requiring mutual assent ensures consumers know they are entering into an agreement. Eglin Fed. Credit Union v. Baird, No. 1D2023-1866, 2024 WL 3956764, at *2 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 28, 2024) (internal citation omitted); See Glosser v. Vasquez, 898 So.2d 1179, 1181 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) ("Thus, to create a contract and trigger contractual obligations, the parties must have a definite and distinct understanding, without which there is no assent and no contract.”) (citation omitted). Florida courts recognize…
Authorities Cited
- Hornblower v. State, 351 So. 2d 716 (Fla. 1977)
- Davis v. State, 834 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
- Olivera v. State, 315 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)
- State v. Norris Riggs, Jr., 890 So. 2d 465 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
- State v. Adams, 378 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)