MARY LOUISE BARNES, APPELLANT,
v.
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY LOUISE BARNES, APPELLEE
MARY LOUISE BARNES, APPELLANT,
IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF MARY LOUISE BARNES, APPELLEE
898 So. 2d 1185
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Opinion of the Court
[*1186] PER CURIAM.
Although the Court has jurisdiction to review the probate order on appeal, see Delgado v. Estate of Garriga, 870 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004), the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. See Am. Red Cross v. Estate of Haynsworth, 708 So. 2d 602, 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(adjudication of incompetency creates prima facie case against proponent of later-executed instrument rebuttable by sufficient showing of execution during “lucid interval”); 3 Fla. Jur.2d Appellate Review § 96 (2004)(failure to assert contention in trial court precludes consideration on appeal).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Emilio Delgado v. The Est. OF Dominga Freyre Garriga, 870 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
- Am. RED Cross v. Lawrence, 708 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)