MICHAEL I. ROSE, APPELLANT,
v.
RONA ROSE, AND LEINOFF & LEMOS, P.A., APPELLEE
MICHAEL I. ROSE, APPELLANT,
RONA ROSE, AND LEINOFF & LEMOS, P.A., APPELLEE
898 So. 2d 1216
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So. 2d 892, 894 (1943)(“We do not deny the right of litigants to settle controversies out of court but any such settlement without the knowledge or notice to counsel and the payment of their fees is fraud on them whether there was an intent to do so or not.”); Knott v. Knott, 395 So. 2d 1196, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Young v. Young, 322 So. 2d 594, 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hernando Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Nazar, 920 So. 2d 794 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…n. Having failed to seek permission from this court to be excused from appearing, or to show good cause for their failure to appear at the mediation, imposition of sanctions are appropriate against both Paul Nazar and Capua. See Holler v. De Hoyos, 898 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Harrelson v. Hensley, 891 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). Accordingly, Paul Nazar and Capua are hereby each ordered to pay fifty percent of the following amounts as sanctions within 30 days from the date of this opinion: 1) all…
-
Juliette A. Holler v. Evelio de Hoyos, 935 So. 2d 78 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…e absence of a transcript, the appellate court is unable to evaluate allegations that error exists in the trial court’s findings but instead must presume such findings are correct). AFFIRMED. THOMPSON and MONACO, JJ., concur. .Holler v. De Hoyos, 898 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (imposing sanctions against Elin De Hoyos for failing to attend mediation); De Hoyos v. Holler, 907 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (appeal); De Hoyos v. Holler, 928 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (appeal of costs judgment). .…
Authorities Cited
- Lenore Miller and Wallace Ruff v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328 (Fla. 1943)
- Knott v. Knott, 395 So. 2d 1196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Young v. Young, 322 So. 2d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)