ANTHONY PAYNE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ANTHONY PAYNE, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
899 So. 2d 483
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(4)(B).
BARFIELD, ALLEN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Witt v. Goben, 940 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…tribunal.”); see also Clark v. Clark, 825 So. 2d 1016, 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)(recognizing that in making child custody determinations, trial court is confined to the record presented). Accordingly, we find no abuse of discretion, Dudley v. Dudley, 899 So. 2d 483, 484 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)(holding our review of child custody decision is subject to deferential abuse of discretion standard of review), and affirm. AFFIRMED. BROWNING, C.J., BARFIELD, and VAN NORTWICK, concur.…