T.H., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred by failing to offer counsel before the disposition hearing, requiring a reversal of the disposition.
A juvenile, T.H., was adjudicated delinquent and committed to a residential program. He was unrepresented at the disposition hearing, and no offer of …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Grand Theft Auto cases and more on FLexlaw
FULMER, Judge.
T.H. was adjudicated delinquent for grand theft auto, fleeing to elude, and possession of cocaine and committed to a high-risk residential program. On appeal, T.H. first challenges the grand theft adjudication, arguing that the State failed to prove that the car which was stolen from the victim was the same car in which T.H. was found. We conclude that the testimony was sufficient to meet the State’s burden of proof and affirm the grand theft auto count without further discussion. T.H. also asserts that the trial court erred in failing to follow the procedural rules for offering him counsel before the disposition hearing. Because we agree with this argument, we reverse the disposition and remand for further proceedings.
Although T.H. had been represented by the public defender’s office for his adjudicatory hearing, he was unrepresented at the disposition hearing, and no offer of counsel was made by the trial court. When this mistake was caught by the court clerk, T.H. was brought back before the trial judge six days after the disposition hearing to be offered counsel, which he refused at that time.
Fundamental error occurs when a trial court fails to comply with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165, which governs the appointment and waiver of counsel in juvenile delinquency proceedings. See M.M.K. v. State, 821 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); J.M.B. v. State, 800 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). We conclude that the proceeding which occurred after the disposition hearing did not cure the error. Accordingly, we reverse the disposition and remand for the trial court to conduct a new disposition hearing after first providing T.H. the opportunity to be represented by court-appointed counsel.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
SALCINES and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Curry v. State, 18 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…There is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”); T.H. v. State, 899 So. 2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that sufficient evidence established that automobile recovered was same automobile stolen from victim).…
Authorities Cited
- J.M.B. v. State, 800 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
- Jennings v. State, 800 So. 2d 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
- M.M.K. v. State, 821 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)