CROSSPOINTE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
SUSAN JOHNSON AND JOAN KEEBLER, RESPONDENTS

Fla. 1st DCA | 2005-03-10
No. 1D04-1829
BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.
899 So. 2d 1145 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2005) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ORDER ASSESSING ATTORNEY’S FEES

PER CURIAM.

Upon this Court’s own initiative, respondent is awarded appellate attorney’s fees to be paid in equal amounts by petitioner and petitioner’s attorney pursuant to section 57.105(1), Florida Statutes. See CrossPointe, Inc. v. Johnson, 894 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The cause is remanded to the trial court to assess reasonable attorney’s fees respondent incurred as a result of defending this appeal.

BROWNING, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Morales v. Marques, 931 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)
    …imply hired another attorney to pursue their claim against Denny’s. Accordingly, we remand this issue to the trial court to assess reasonable attorney’s fees incurred by Marques as a result of defending this appeal. See Crosspointe, Inc. v. Johnson, 899 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR DETERMINATION OF FEES. PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw