LILLIAN VLOCK, APPELLANT,
v.
BEATRICE WHITE, A SINGLE WOMAN, IRVING F. KALBACK, FAIR FINANCE CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND M. A. C. CREDIT CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
LILLIAN VLOCK, APPELLANT,
BEATRICE WHITE, A SINGLE WOMAN, IRVING F. KALBACK, FAIR FINANCE CO., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND M. A. C. CREDIT CO., INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
90 So. 2d 113
Florida Supreme Court (1956)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The only point in the case is whether or not appellant violated the usury statutes. The record and briefs have been examined and the judgment appealed from appears to be controlled by and is affirmed on authority of Richter Jewelry Co. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199, 169 So. 750; Stoutamire v. North Florida Loan Ass’n, 152 Fla. 321, 11 So. 2d 570, and Speier v. Monnah Park Block Co., Fla., 84 So. 2d 697.
Affirmed.
DREW, C, J., and TERRELL, HOB-SON and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1989)…election of a jury. Because the original information had been vitiated, the defendant had been tried on a purported information which did not comply with the Florida Constitution. Relying on Alvarez, we again reversed a conviction in Sipos v. State, 90 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1956), where the trial judge had permitted a similar substantive amendment of an information during trial and over the objection of the defendant. In Wilcox, the court applied Alvarez to a situation where the state filed an information describi…
-
Lacros v. State, 339 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1976)…ly convicted. In an opinfeh reported at 326 So. 2d 220, the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the action taken by the trial court. Because of conflict in decision with Alvarez v. State, 157 Fla. 254, 25 So. 2d 661 (1946), and Sipos v. State, 90 So. 2d 113 (Fla.1956), we issued our order allowing certiorari and dispensing with oral argument. After studying the briefs submitted by the parties, we have concluded that the District Court of Appeal reached the proper result in the instant case. In Alvarez…
-
Lambert v. State, 111 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959)…eading must be amended, and as amended must be signed and sworn to by the authorized prosecuting official and then refiled, whereupon the defendant must again be arraigned, a jury selected, and the trial proceed anew. See also: Sipos v. State, Fla., 90 So. 2d 113; Fekany v. State, 111 Fla. 598, 149 So. 590. If, however, the true name of the alleged owner simply has not been accurately stated, the error is curable by amendment under the statute. Alvarez v. State, supra. The suffix “Jr.” or “Sr.” is ordinaril…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The Richter Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Schweinert, 125 Fla. 199 (Fla. 1935)
- Stoutamire v. N. Fla. Loan Ass'n, Inc., 152 Fla. 321 (Fla. 1943)
- Speier v. Monnah Park Block Co., Inc., 84 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1955)